So I finished the second third of The Tyranny of Experts. This part was about the “Blank Slate” – this notion that non-Western countries are masses of chaos just waiting for a technocrat to come along and impose the order which automatically yields improvements in education, health, and economics. Easterly illustrated this with Bill Gates' myopic reliance on the temporary decrease in child mortality rates over five years in Ethiopia as conclusive proof of effective autocratic governance.
What the
book says
Basically,
prioritization of individual or autocratic rights hundreds of years
ago carries implications for current matters such as trade,
democracy, and rates of organ donation. For example, medieval free
cities with histories of individual rights, commerce, and government
by a council of rotating members were better prepared to fight
against military intervention than autocratically-governed societies
with a “collectivist” (read: conformist and non-challenging)
citizen experience. So one result of a collective versus individual
focus is incentives – people with an individual investment will be
more driven to defend their rights and society and resources than
people who are spending half their time working for others' benefit.
